Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2009 at 21:12:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Fjærlandsfjorden2.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fjærlandsfjorden2.jpg
Comment There are some blown areas (see image notes). Maybe they can be corrected with Photoshop. Besides that the picture is of great quality. -- JovanCormac22:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The only parts of the picture that are blown are the window frames of the green house. Neither the boat (whose brightest spots have the RGB values 248/248/235) nor the roof of the brown building are blown. If you see them as blown, you may need to calibrate your monitor. Also, this is not a tone-mapped HDR picture, so it is only natural that the picture has both bright and dark parts. --Aqwis (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to suggest an alternative white balance, but I think the current white balance corresponds approximately to how I saw the scene when I took the picture. --Aqwis (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've uploaded a version with better WB IMO. I simply used the mountain's snow as a neutral color. I encourage you to do the same with the original file (IOT avoid multiple JPEG rewrites) --S23678 (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Aqwis -- Aqwis (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Support -- Aqwis (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment There are some blown areas (see image notes). Maybe they can be corrected with Photoshop. Besides that the picture is of great quality. -- JovanCormac 22:24, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
