Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Esfahan Craftsman Art.jpg

File:Esfahan Craftsman Art.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2012 at 09:34:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Esfahan Craftsman Art.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Esfahan Craftsman Art.jpg

•  Info created by M@Mad - uploaded by Ahura21 - nominated by Alborzagros -- Alborzagros (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Kasir (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Peter23 (talk) 10:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 18:05, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --JDP90 (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sorry for rowing against the flood guys, but I see nothing extraordinay here justifying the star. Nice size, very good quality but no magic (for me). -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:43, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose The background seems to be added artificially; overlapping with the edges in many places. JKadavoor Jee 06:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't think so. The "overlap" is just reflection of the yellow material, which appears to be a glossy plastic. In fact, if there wasn't yellow reflected on the glaze, I'd be convinced it was added artificially. Colin (talk) 13:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks; but I didn't understand how a "Strobist: Single 430EXII bounced off the wall from left hand side." makes such reflections on both sides, and this bottom shadow. May be you're right. Further, I don't like this "snap shot style" angle of view (from somewhat top). But I think it is worth to be showcased here. JKadavoor Jee 16:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I like the contrasting colours and that makes a welcome change from "x on white" product shots. Colin (talk) 13:07, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I think exactly the contrary to Alvesgaspar (sorry Joaquim, not the first (nor the last) time ;)) To me, this objects looks magic, and the blue color is really wonderful. A little flaw maybe: something wrong (banding ?) in the yellow color in foreground. But an extra-ordinary picture to me.--Jebulon (talk) 13:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support nice --Ximeg (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support a bit too shadowy, but overall nice.--Kürbis (✔) 23:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support - the contrast works quite well and nice with a warm background as opposed to the almost always present white background... --heb [T C E] 13:41, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Claus (talk) 08:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Arufarufarufa (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Voting period was over and not enough edits to vote. --Ivar (talk) 14:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 17:40, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects