Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg

File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2023 at 21:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
•  Info An enamel cross by Hermann Jünger, photo created by PantheraLeo1359531, cross created by Hermann Jünger - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support I'm not sure why I'm not feeling awed by this, but I want to give the photo a little love because it's an unusual subject for FPC and I think it's very well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment This is an image of a modern artwork in a German church. In my opinion it is a copyright violation to share this image without explicit permission by the artist! --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment That's a good point, unfortunately. He died in 2005. This photo would be deleted if nominated at COM:DR, absent the permission that as Uoaei1 states is needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Wait a moment. I thought the same, too, but when you scroll down on the description page, there is a hint: “Permission, see: File:Ornamientiertes Altarkreuz von Hermann Jünger 20200203 HDR.jpg”. That photo shows the same cross and actually contains a permission ticket. So it seems that there is an explicit permission by the heirs of the artist, Hermann Jünger … Could you confirm this, PantheraLeo1359531 😺? --Aristeas (talk) 06:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I asked for permission and the cross is licensed (by the heirs) via CC-BY-SA-4.0 as stated here: File:Ornamientiertes Altarkreuz von Hermann Jünger 20200203 RAW.png, greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

PantheraLeo1359531, you should provide the copyright information for all images in the same way as in File:Ornamientiertes Altarkreuz von Hermann Jünger 20200203 RAW.png. Not just for one image, where it can be easily overseen. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Uoaei1 Thanks for the hint, I fixed it --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support per Ikan (at the top of the votes). --06:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

  This vote is not valid due to incomplete signature, sorry. --A.Savin 14:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

  Oops, I made a very stupid error here – somehow the signature shortcut was not resolved correctly. I apologize for the inconveniences. Sorry, --Aristeas (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically excellent but a boring subject IMO. Would support as a Quality Image but not getting the "wow" for FP. BigDom (talk) 13:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I've to agree, the subject is not really beautiful to me and although the quality is really good I miss something else here (lighting, historical value,...) Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose pretty disturbing and unflattering background, zero sense of scale (actual size of cross), not a historical artifact to make up for shortcomings. Renata3 (talk) 02:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC)