Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elephant hawkmoth (Deilephila elpenor) male.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2022 at 08:34:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
- Info The UK's most colourful large moth. Focus stack of 26 images. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support When I saw this on QIC, I expected to see this excellent portrait here. Is its eye closed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, and no. Moths don't have eyelids. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Consistent focus stacking, providing a high level of detail. Attractive colors. Still the light is a bit harsh, and the shadow unappealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Weak opposeBeautiful subject, lovely colors, excellent level of detail and I don't really mind the shadows. But a few more frames would have been necessary to get the whole animal sharp: The edge of the front wing is very soft. It does seem to merge in with the background, which really messes with my depth perception. The repetitive wavy patterns in the background are weird too. Surely that must be an artifact of the stacking process - not necessarily the dark-bright-dark |||||-like pattern, but at least the vvvvv-like component on top of that? I'd be more lenient with a smaller subject, as I know optics can become quite tricky in the microscopic range, but judging this against other candidates in the 1:1-ish range, I'm tending towards opposing. Still on the edge, though, because it does have a lot of wow - might reconsider later ... --El Grafo (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Actually El Grafo the background is a comfy wicker chair! I had no time to move it out of the way as the moth moved. I had the camera's focus-bracketing image count set at 40. With a live animal in the open air, even that's a large number. I normally use 15 or 20. Would have needed around 70 to get nearest wing in focus, but only if I could have managed to get the camera to focus on the wing leading edge. For better or worse, I chose to focus on the front leg. Camera was on a monopod, braced against a wooden chair. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh dear, thanks, that explains the pattern. Who would have thought! And if there's any part on that animal that can get away with being unsharp, it's exactly that wing. Oppose struck. I'll think about a support, but I'm not sure I can get over those waves. Knowing what they are helps, but I still find them distracting. --El Grafo (talk) 09:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very impressive. (IMHO the legs are a bit overexposed and oversharpened, but this does not make a difference because of the overall quality and effect.) --Aristeas (talk) 09:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 11:52, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice work and interesting subject, but the noisy background is a little bit distractiong IMO. -- Wolf im Wald 00:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support I understand the constraints on taking the image, but that blurry foreground is still a little distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile, Daniel and Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 21:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)