Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:El Atazar Pano.jpg

File:El Atazar Pano.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2010 at 08:48:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:El Atazar Pano.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:El Atazar Pano.jpg

•  Info created by Keta - uploaded by Keta - nominated by Keta -- Keta (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Keta (talk) 08:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Yiyi (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Horizon may or may not be a bit distorted, but it's excellent overall. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:27, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Trace (talk) 22:55, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Like the shade of blue of the waters.  fetchcomms☛ 00:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Nice picture, but falls off on the right side. It is not that hard to get it right, so I see no reason to support it as is. --Dschwen (talk) 00:55, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful. As Fetchcomms mentions, the strong blue waters are especially nice and bring out the image. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 03:01, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 03:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Regretfully per DSchwen. Please restitch and bring it back. Great view. --99of9 (talk) 04:42, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, but I don't quite understand your complaints. I see it all right and I'm not willing to restitch the image, at least until I understand what you mean. - Keta (talk) 08:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
    •  Comment The right hand side horizon is significantly lower than the left (which is consistent with the middle). I don't think this can be explained by the real topology, since the right hand side is upstream. This kind of horizon warping is a common stitching problem if you don't set horizontal guidepoints. Yours is not as bad as some we've seen, but it's worth correcting to make this scene perfect! --99of9 (talk) 14:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
      •  Comment Ok, I see what you mean now. I think we have to blame the topology, though ;) Actually, the left hand side is upstream and the mountains there are some 1000 m higher than the ones in the right. Anyway, you might be right, but I'm positive that the tilt is not as much as it looks. I'll probably review this issue, definitely not right now though :), but honestly I think it's quite right. - Keta (talk) 19:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
        •  Comment It might be slightly tilted, perhaps as much as a degree, but certainly no more. One useful trick with panoramas showing water is to set vertical guides between objects and their reflections. Clouds are particularly convenient for this, since they're far from the surface, but if there's any wind at all you shouldn't do this unless both the cloud and the reflection are in the same frame. Anyway, I don't really find the minuscule tilt, if it's there at all, distracting enough to keep me from supporting (and I'm usually pretty picky about these things). —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:35, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, with or without tilt correction. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - nice panorama. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 23:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--663h (talk) 12:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Amada44 (talk) 20:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Nice scene, good composition. Explanation given for apparent tilt is reasonable. --Avenue (talk) 01:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas