Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Do-Bittermark 2719.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Do-Bittermark 2719.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2008 at 08:37:59
Info created by mbdortmund - uploaded by mbdortmund - nominated by Simonizer (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Support Good composition, nice use of DOF -- Simonizer (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Support Excellent Composition, proper use of DOF --Herrick (talk) 10:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose No more lights and colors. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:17, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Support a powerful image --ianaré (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Georgez (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Support great expression --Niabot (talk) 22:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose I would vote pro, if the licence were more userfriendly. GFDL license is not a good license for imagines in the policy of the free content.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 13:42, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose No wow for me at all. --JalalV (talk) 14:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Support There are several interesting issues here. First of all the fact that this work is a Memorial and as a public work of art, it worked its way through and this is it, that in itself speaks of the merit of the work. Some may argue that this is not necessarily a good argument that legitimizes quality, but considering the historical aspects, as well as the art tradition of the region, I think we are on the safe side. It would be hard to conceive that Germany would build bad cars, for example. The second issue is the photographic representation of a work of art. In that sense, even though the entire work is not being represented, the synthesis is a powerful one. The use of depth of field and the sensation that it creates, makes the image come towards the observer, and the faces evoke powerful emotions. Other elements such as texture and composition are also very well managed. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:18, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
SupportTiago Vasconcelos (talk) 20:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose --Karelj (talk) 23:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose--Avala (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. D-Kuru (talk) 12:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC)