Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dew on spider web Luc Viatour.jpg

File:Dew on spider web Luc Viatour.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2010 at 03:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dew on spider web Luc Viatour.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dew on spider web Luc Viatour.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Lviatour - nominated by The High Fin Sperm Whale --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm very sorry and it's a pitty. But the background is very noisy, most of the pic is OoF, there are some spots...--Jebulon (talk) 10:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 03:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support – I'm sorry, but I can't understand the oppose. I find it's a very fine and nice photo with wonderful reflections in the drips. --Steindy (talk) 10:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- as Jebulon, nothing extraordinary. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - I too don't understand the opposes, yes not "extraordinary", but nice to look at. And the landscape in the droplets is interesting. Mlpearc pull my chain 'Tribs 16:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment -- Well, I wouldn't like to patronize but did you care to read the guidelines? To 'look nice' is not enough for reaching FP status! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment An explanation of my vote : IT IS an extraordinary picture. Yes the reflections in the droplets are wonderful, and the landscape too, I agree. As others, I am perfectly able to feel the "wow" effect, and it's the case here. But I'm disappointed by my very careful review. At high resolution, you could see what I mean. And I'm terribly sorry, because I'm sure I do not have the capacity to take such a picture.--Jebulon (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Jebulon, and for double web lines towards lower left. Looks very nice in thumbnail, but not FP quality, sorry. --Avenue (talk) 09:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice composition and subject, but quality isn't quite there. Jujutacular ^T · C 14:43, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not FP quality, per previous opposes. Steven Walling 18:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:50, 14 June 2010 (UTC)