Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deuterocohnia lorentziana in Botanischer Garten Muenster (2).jpg

File:Deuterocohnia lorentziana in Botanischer Garten Muenster (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2022 at 18:42:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Deuterocohnia lorentziana in Botanischer Garten Muenster (2).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deuterocohnia lorentziana in Botanischer Garten Muenster (2).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Poales
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support I suppose I'd want a little stronger color, but that's not necessary; it's fine as it is. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Daniel Cmao20 (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Daniel. Interesting natural pattern. --Aristeas (talk) 09:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality image, but I do not see any reason fo PR nominatinon. There are thousands images similar to this one, part of some plant and whar....???? -- Karelj (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose The dead stuff and bare bits ruin it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. Nothing attention-catching in this image. --Tagooty (talk) 03:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just a QI in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:27, 22 March 2022 (UTC)