Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dead baby bird.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Original, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2009 at 23:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tony Wills -- Tony Wills (talk) 23:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Tony Wills (talk) 23:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- FPC needs more bird nominations, a dead one is better than none (good educational value (just in case you're a en:FPC addict ;-)) :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 23:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support poor chick... died before it ever was able to fly :( --Mbz1 (talk) 01:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Very interesting photo with a lot of educational value. I would like to see that shadow in the bottom right corner cropped though. Tiptoety talk 01:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- I've experimented a bit, but if I crop that out then the overall composition is too tight, I like to have a bit of space around the edge of the subject. --Tony Wills (talk) 07:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Were you seeing the big shadow on the original upload, or the small shadow left in the second version - I just noticed that the image page was showing the original upload version, rather than my crop uploaded over top. I have now purged that and it should show the correct crop now. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Info On all my recent uploads I have tried to upload the original unedited photo first, then my best cropped/retouched version over-top. That way people can work with the original if they want to make improvements. --Tony Wills (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- I've experimented a bit, but if I crop that out then the overall composition is too tight, I like to have a bit of space around the edge of the subject. --Tony Wills (talk) 07:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky (talk) 06:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral technically a very good photo. ..and i'd say it is a sure QI but for FP I miss the convincing composition which makes it somehow special. Still documents the subject very well. --AngMoKio (talk) 18:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per AngMoKio, there is nothing special about this, even though it is a lovely picture. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have seen many dead animals but this is striking in that it is complete, not half eaten, not fly blown, not decomposing nor squashed road kill. Looks as though it died suddenly - head is thrown back, maybe a broken neck after falling from a nest. It tells of a life cut short before it had the chance to open its eyes and see the world - I think it is a wee bit special :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Very educational; a lot of people probably think that a baby bird has feathers. -- JovanCormac 05:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well of course some are hatched with feathers, but I like the way you can see through the transparent skin and see the developing feathers before they emerge --Tony Wills (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per AngMoKio. —kallerna™ 11:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 12:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per TonyBallioni. Lycaon (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support This is a very deep picture, in the emotional sense. You just can't look away. An apt analogy for humanity, perhaps... Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 15:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Airwolf (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support The look on its face tells a story of woe, a life cut down before it could bloom. Basically, what Tony Wills said. AlexAH (talk) 05:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose As AngMoKio--Karel (talk) 22:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Yann (talk) 10:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Retouched, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2009 at 23:10:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Comment I used Adobe Lightroom's local retouching tool to create this new version without the bottom right shadow. Is that better? →Diti the penguin — 09:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- That is probably better (although colours look a bit washed out in that corner). But I just noticed that the image page was showing the original upload version, rather than my crop uploaded over top. I have now purged that and it should show the correct crop now - I could see why there were objections to the large shadow in the original :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per above TonyBallioni (talk) 00:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Yann (talk) 10:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)