Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DFB HG 3-4 Gletsch.jpg

File:DFB HG 3-4 Gletsch.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2017 at 10:44:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:DFB HG 3-4 Gletsch.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DFB HG 3-4 Gletsch.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles#Land vehicles
•  Info Rack-and-adhesion locomotive HG 3/4 nr. 4 of the Dampfbahn Furka-Bergstrecke arriving at Gletsch.
•  Info created and uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 10:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 10:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Extremely picturesque, good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very good! Although this is very nice colourful photo, a B&W version would have a total antique touch as there isn't almost any modern thing to see. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

• I think you got it the wrong way around, This is actually an excellent restoration of this old photo: . I think Kabelleger did an astonishing job. --cart-Talk 21:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

• The joke is, the color version is a 2011 photograph and had been digitally aged by W.carter. – Lucas^T 23:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

• This is awesome, thanks, cart. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --cart-Talk 21:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Would be better if the train were slightly closer, but great photo nonetheless. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful scenery and very well captured. Looks almost like a painting to me. --Code (talk) 06:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:22, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Although it would be nice to have a geocode. Cart and Basotxerri are right ... there is just something timeless about this one. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 19:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Shizhao: you need to state a reason why you oppose – Lucas^T 15:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

And this guy [1] is a administrator here people! --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I think, you find the reason here --Llez (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The character broke the composition--shizhao (talk) 12:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support An excellent focus to main parts of the photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 19:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles#Land vehicles