Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Curved wrench.jpg

File:Curved wrench.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2011 at 21:11:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Curved wrench.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Curved wrench.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice photo of a boring subject. ;-) Steven Walling 22:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good -- aghith 05:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose DOF to low, lightning bad: the shadows are to dark. Sorry for me not a FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:56, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree to Alchemist-hp, not good enough for a studio shot --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose interesting approach, but I agree: bad lighting, too shallow DOF, noisy --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support DOF could have been better. But I really like the unusual subject, the no nonsense composition, which is very eye-catching. The light helps illustrating the structure of the surface of the tool. I do not mind the somewhat noisy background, which have been noticed by other reviewers as well. In this case — for me — it adds a feeling of texture and roughness to the photo, well fitting for a worn tool. For me this photo transforms an everyday object, which I would normally see as "boring" into something very interesting. --Slaunger (talk) 21:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support per Slaunger. A picture of a worn tool, out of context, gets somewhat surreal and eerie. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 02:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support A very nice and bit abstract picture in my opinion. very nice composition, lighting, colour ... - Benh (talk) 14:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- per Steven Walling -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 18:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- not per Steven Walling, also surely nothing women will sympathize with. Best greetings from the Gendergap mailing list. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 12:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  •  Question Is your reason for opposing supposed to be a joke, a point, or an oppose just to distance yourself from another user? --Slaunger (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I'm also a little disappointed by the DOF, but aesthetically it's excellent, and I love the lighting. --99of9 (talk) 12:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much noise on the background, and especially very limited interest. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't think it's noise, I think that's just what the surfacetop looks like. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 13:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)