Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocodylus acutus close up.jpg

File:Crocodylus acutus close up.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2009 at 18:04:10

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like this image because it shows the different textures of the skin plus the coloring, the camouflage pattern. -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it too.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Question How many crocs you got? Muhammad 18:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment LOL! Hundreds... from time to time I go over them, pick out a few and do a little bit of photoshop. I am planning to go back to the swamp (without wife and kids) soon to get the definite American Crocodyle shots. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Rather noisy. Lycaon (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Dear Lycaon, in simple math... ISO 1600 + 1/60 ss + f5.6 = low light conditions = noise, an expected effect, as grain was before digital, which does not negate the information value of the image. Any semi-competent photographer can figure that one out. Of course, in a warm lab with a dead animal better photographic conditions could be available. I prefer to leave the croc alive. Noisy? Noise camouflages quite well in this image. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:35, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Impressive! But disliked the crop. Crapload (talk) 01:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment The intention of this image is to show the skin characteristics of the croc, this crop gives us a view of three different textures in the head area. To zoom in cuts information out, and to zoom out would include unwanted information in the image. Or how would you approach the crop? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Neutral I like this croc picture the best. But I am afraid that if I vote for it, and others pass as well, we will end up with dozens of crocs on FP! JalalV (talk) 01:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support But only if no other croc pics are chosen for FP this month. Otherwise Oppose. (Can I do that?) -- JalalV (talk) 01:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

• :-) How about Biding and vote later ? --Richard Bartz (talk) 02:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose And another low quality image of some crocodile. --Karel (talk) 21:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Question Could it be another low quality opinion of some low quality critic? It is said that the only authority is the person who produces results. Do you? ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per other opposers --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 11:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose There's no element in the picture standing out, in the physical scene itself (very flat scene), and in the composition of the picture. --S23678 (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose —kallerna™ 17:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 10:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)