Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coypus.jpg

File:Coypus.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2017 at 03:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Coypus.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coypus.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info all by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tack sharp. Great compostion. Good job! PumpkinSky talk 03:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per PumpkinSky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Take a look at the out-of-focus areas in the background. The image is totally oversharpened. --Granada (talk) 08:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - Are you objecting to the use of bokeh, or do you mean something else? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I object that at ISO 1000 sharpening the image that much incorporates a lot of very ugly luma noise which becomes especially visible in the background. Overall that impression of tack sharpness results from using too much sharpening, that might be acceptable for QI, but not for FP. --Granada (talk) 08:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Comment The ISO setting has generated a lot of noise which remains on the animal and rocks and I also wonder if it is possible to fix the blown nose/snout? See notes on image. Charles (talk) 09:12, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

 Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

I don't think so. Charles (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Look at your own picture here, maybe -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 00:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

• There is already a FP of a similar Coypu here (with the same lighting and nearly as good quality), thus  I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Why can't both photos be FPs? I can understand if you withdrew because you think you'll never get 7 supporting votes, but I doubt the fact that the other photo is an FP is a good reason to withdraw. That said, it is your decision whether to withdraw or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks Ikan Kekek, I think it's important to have at least one FP for Wikipedia, and fortunately there is already one. Thus, my picture is less useful considering this. But yes, you're right too, I also withdraw because of the lack of supports (not yours, thanks again !), and think this image is probably not great enough for some non technical reasons -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:59, 21 December 2017 (UTC)