Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cosplay of Miranda Lawson (Mass Effect).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2022 at 16:37:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cosplay of Miranda Lawson from Mass Effect
  •  Comment Doesn't seem like it should be, but I don't know what the laws are. If someone takes a photo of me wearing a Superman shirt, do they have to pay royalties to DC Comics if they sell the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: I do agree that US law is not yet clear on this (the wording of the "costuming" tag on the picture is enough indication of that). But I can't see how the three-dimensional artwork of a movie/TV/comic book/videogame character's distinct costume as long as that is not everyday wear (like, I don't think cosplaying as characters from The Office—which I've seen people do—is really going to trigger a copyright suit since the way the characters dress is composed entirely of off-the-rack useful articles) is any different from a three-dimensional public artwork like a sculpture not protected under FoP, especially after the Supreme Court's Star Athletica decision a few years back. Daniel Case (talk) 16:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think there is a difference between taking a picture of a person wearing certain clothes vs. copying the actual clothes themselves, just as Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits notes that there is a difference between a bottle and a label on the bottle. -- King of ♥ 01:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: Well, Star Athletica is a Supreme Court decision that goes more to the point here (although it is the same general principle, that purely aesthetic elements of product design are copyrightable), and also as a Supreme Court decision takes precedence over a Ninth Circuit decision. To be fair, it does not seem like this issue has been directly tested yet. But I can't imagine a ruling going any other way. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]