Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clara Morgane 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Clara Morgane 1.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2009 at 01:59:28
- Info uploaded by Videmus Omnia - nominated by -- Claus (talk) 01:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Claus (talk) 01:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ianaré (talk) 02:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Pro2 (talk) 16:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree, this picture fulfills most criteria, but I don't understand its value.I think it's more suited to be a quality image rather than featured. --Ernie (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose This photograph is technically correct, but I do not see how is is exceptionally good. The pose is not original, the subject is not original, and the overall result is not beautiful in my humble opinion. David.Monniaux (talk) 18:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice person, average photo, bad background. -- MJJR (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Ernie. This is a quality image, not a featured image, due to its contents Bevegelsesmengde (talk) 11:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Karel (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support /Daniel78 (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - Everything has been said -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Paris 16 (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Finally pictures of beautiful humans! I can't understand why the subject should be ugly that photos of it are FP-material. —kallerna™ 15:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful humans are great, but this is not a great photo - the background is too distracting --Tom dl (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Neutral really good picture, but see Ernie --kaʁstn 19:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose per David Monniaux. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose - per Tom dl --Pudelek (talk) 10:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a pole coming out of her head! Downtowngal (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Awkward pose, distracting background, looks heavily airbrushed. Kaldari (talk) 21:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Vulgar and static pose, distracting background, bad point of view, subject centred, bizarre and rather unflattering position of the left breast. By no means a bad photograph, but neither what I'd expect from a featured one. Rama (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
result: 8 support, 11 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 16:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)