Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chute Montmorency3.JPG

File:Chute Montmorency3.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 May 2020 at 12:42:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chute Montmorency3.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chute Montmorency3.JPG

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Québec
•  Info: a rainbow below the Montmorency Falls, Quebec, Canada. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a nice waterfall and the rainbow adds an extra touch. But it's neither that striking, nor of superior quality to command a FP. Sorry. --MB-one (talk) 17:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per MBone --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I was excited to see this image because it is the city where I live but unfortunately the quality is very low --Wilfredor (talk) 20:06, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The quality is of course not "very low" (please refrain from obviously unfair assessments, Wilfredor...), but nonetheless the picture seems like an out-of-camera jpeg, and there are many chromatic aberrations. We don't accept CA's for a good reason: there are not only unnecessary, but also very easy to remove, especially if the picture is made from the RAW file. --A.Savin 23:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per MB-one.--Peulle (talk) 08:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is fine but I agree with A. Savin, this picture is surely an out-of-camera JPEG and it seems that the in-camera noise reduction and other processing has made the photo look worse quality than it is. Going back to the RAW could make this a lot better for me. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support though the crop is a bit too tight at top right. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per MB-one. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive. And I prefer the natural presentation of the falling water. --Milseburg (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per MB-one Piotr Bart (talk) 07:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)