Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chichen Itza 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chichen Itza 2.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2010 at 19:55:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Dschwen - uploaded by Dschwen - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 19:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Miguel Bugallo 19:55, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
Comment this version of the photo series is already featured. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:22, 14 December 2010 (UTC)- Support --Pudelek (talk) 21:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support composition, focus, sharpness and colours are good. sadly distracting amounts of tourists destroying the aura of this illustration and the landmark itself. metadata should be added. you might as well want to see this photograph by the same author, which has been featured already. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 21:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry kaʁstn, but... it's the same image File:Chichen Itza 3.jpg and this image? Can not be this image FP? Can not be FP another image of Chichén Itzá? I think that this image can be FP, but I don't know all, I'm sure that I don't know all: Can you explain to me what happens?--Miguel Bugallo 00:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- please look that I didn't oppose. And I don't FPX. So of course the picture could vote featured. I just want to mark that there is a (somewhat similar) shot from the same photo series which is already faetured. Nothing different. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:42, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sadly I must express to me in English, in Spanish, it would be different. Ok, Carschten. I have already observed that, but your words are a observation to be the image FP. Rules? Rules nonwritten? I can accept the norms nonwritten of the community. My question is this: As they are? If I knew those rules, perhaps I had not proposed this image (Sorry: very poor english)--Miguel Bugallo 20:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Español(Spanish): Deseo hacer constar que el hecho de que haya propuesto esta imagen no se debe a un acto que pretenda promocionar mi identidad ni la identidad de cualquier otro. Ultimamente he estado en México, he intentado hacer fotos de este mismo objeto, y me he quedado sorprendido de la calidad de esta foto: Las mías no valen ni para ser propuestas para imagen de calidad, tras ver esta. Si he dado con esta imagen es porque he tenido que intentar categorizar las mías. Más vale que proponga esta imagen y no las mías--Miguel Bugallo 20:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment In response to Miguel´s statement above: Those two pictures, the one kaʁstn pointed out and this one are of the same subject, but from different viewpoints. No guideline or rules, written or unwritten says that two similar pictures can´t be voted as FP. The only purpose for kaʁstn pointing out a similar image seems to be that other users could make use of that information, for individual accessment of the picture if they personally like having two similar pictures as FP, or not. I hope that this explanation clarifies the issue.--Snaevar (talk) 00:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good lighting and balanced composition. Steven Walling 02:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Ok Snaevar (in response to...). I understand.--Miguel Bugallo 12:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Marmoulak (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support: Nice, informative, colorful.--Garrondo (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Snaevar (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Mulazimoglu (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
