Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chalice Pizino MBA Lyon L689.jpg

File:Chalice Pizino MBA Lyon L689.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2010 at 15:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Chalice Pizino MBA Lyon L689.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chalice Pizino MBA Lyon L689.jpg

•  Info created by Bartolommeo Di Tommé, alias Pizino C. 1390 - uploaded by Marie-Lan Nguyen - nominated by IdLoveOne -- IdLoveOne (talk) 15:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 15:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 00:40, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support It's quite beautiful, and almost brings me to envy. :P Belle ^{tête-à-tête} 08:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 11:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Ghabara (talk) 22:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
  • It is not a requirement, but a short explanation for an oppose vote is generally appreciated...--Jebulon (talk) 12:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
    • it's a bit simple for my taste.I do not like the angle of the picture is taken.There are plenty of brightness and refraction of light.sorry for the delay ;-)--Ghabara (talk) 13:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose the object is not presented in an appealing way, too obvious it is a museum piece sitting on a shelf. --ianaré (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per ianaré. --99of9 (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per ianaré. Lycaon (talk) 09:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - quality image, but not quite at featured level in my opinion, because of the composition and angle of view. Jonathunder (talk) 13:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Can you explain what's wrong with the angle? I don't think I know a better way to show good detail of something like this then a close-up straight-on. --IdLoveOne (talk) 05:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
  • There is a lot I like about this, but what I don't like is the background (slightly distracting) and how the top of the chalice looks misshapen--which I thought was due to the angle of view. Perhaps I was wrong? Jonathunder (talk) 22:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
    • I think it's just like that, 600 years is plenty of time something could've been damaged, but it could possibly also be the angle I suppose. --IdLoveOne (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Alt

•  Info Changed background. --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I know, I should be looking at the quality and everything, but since I'm a newcomer I'll just vote by taste. :) I personally think the trophy is beautiful, but the background now looks a little unrealistic compared to the trophy. I liked the first one best. Kindly, Belle ^{tête-à-tête} 06:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above and also poor masking on the foot. Not every object is nicely cut-able: it has to be sharp all over to have a good degree of success. Lycaon (talk) 21:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Alt 2

•  Info Transparent background (wasn't sure if interlaced GIF was better or not or if I should've saved as PNG). --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the first one was the best conversion to GIF has muddled this one up, and it seems poorly cut out (look at the top rim of the cup). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the first was the non-interlaced version, I guess I'll know for next time, but the apparent "poor cutout" look is just something that always happens with thumbnails of transparent GIFs. The top doesn't look anywhere as bad in full-scale. --IdLoveOne (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Actually, I barely saw the thumbnail. I looked only at full res. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Jagged edges and posterizing (loss of information) by GIF conversion. Lycaon (talk) 21:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)