Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Central Railway Station Hall in Antwerp.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2014 at 22:11:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Jules Grandgagnage - uploaded by Jules Grandgagnage - nominated by Jules Grandgagnage -- Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 22:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 22:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry the window is overexposed and the people in foreground is disturb.Above is blurry. --LivioAndronico talk 07:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe, Jules Grandgagnage understands it as a Photoshop work in hyperrealistic canvas painting style. Even the shifting is realistic. At least for a wide angle lens.--Hubertl (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- I personally find it a pleasing image. Under the circumstances (the large hall was poorly lit and ISO had to be cranked up to 1600) the photo turned out just fine. Processing was necessary (denoise, sharpening, clarity) to get a better image. It's true that I look at a photo with the eye of a painter, I do not zoom in to background details because the human eye cannot do this either. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Maybe, Jules Grandgagnage understands it as a Photoshop work in hyperrealistic canvas painting style. Even the shifting is realistic. At least for a wide angle lens.--Hubertl (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the image is clearly overprocessed and would probably still struggle to be featurable without this issue --DXR (talk) 16:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
- Uploaded a new version (4,75 megapixel) with low compression and less loss. By the way, 'overexposed'? Au contraire... the light bursting through the windows high above adds some welcome drama to the scene. I could have chosen to work on that part, but I honestly think it's better this way. Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2014 (UTC)