Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment Because of hiding big part of ceiling behind the chandelier, I took another picture that shows hidden section.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Weak support Outstanding quality as ever but the crops disturb me a bit. I'd rather see the whole circle of the dome rather than have it cut off in various places. Also the crops aren't quite symmetrical which is a bit disturbing. Still, the very high resolution and beautiful details make it FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Support Given the circumstances, the technical limitations are less than they might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran