Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cartridge for Gillette Mach3 razor, 2015-08-03.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cartridge for Gillette Mach3 razor, 2015-08-03.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2015 at 00:50:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Cartridge for Gillette Mach3 razor. All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)- Support well done - even when it´s not really wow. for a FP. --Hubertl 08:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose well done, some slight fringe at top, but no wow at all, subject not FP worthy in my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 19:30, 20 August 2015 (UTC)- Support Not something people typically submit pictures of here. Nice and (ahem) sharp. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Jeb--LivioAndronico (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing wrong with that from a technical POV, but no wow for me as well. Might have better chances at some of the Wikipedia FPCs? --El Grafo (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- No article on razor cartridges on the English Wikipedia yet, but it would almost certainly pass an English Wikipedia FPC if there were. As for the "wow", I was inspired to nominate this after looking at Commons:Featured pictures/Objects, which has a number of images of the same technical quality (though generally with much larger subjects). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- The "wow" requirement certainly can be a problem for common objects like this. When the subject itself has little or no wow, a wow-effect can still be achieved by making a photograph of it that is outstanding in some other kind of way. Might be an enormously high resolution/magnification, creative lighting, an unusual perspective, something that makes it stand out from the masses. There can be a very thin line between "just very good" and "featureable" for sure – and the decision on which side of the line a nomination falls on is certainly a personal, subjective one (see also my comment on this nomination). No doubt that this is a high quality image. But we already have QI, so FP needs something more than just that. FWIW, I still think this might be the best image of this type of cartridge we have, so I've taken the liberty of nominating it at VI as well. --El Grafo (talk) 10:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- No article on razor cartridges on the English Wikipedia yet, but it would almost certainly pass an English Wikipedia FPC if there were. As for the "wow", I was inspired to nominate this after looking at Commons:Featured pictures/Objects, which has a number of images of the same technical quality (though generally with much larger subjects). — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
