Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cape Pillar.jpg

File:Cape Pillar.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2010 at 06:03:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cape Pillar.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cape Pillar.jpg

•  Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Elekhh -- Elekhh (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Elekhh (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Citron (talk) 09:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wow, great landscape. But it seems to me it needs a tiny rotation CCW. -- Onno Zweers (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Great image, pin-sharp too! --Murdockcrc (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose until the distortion/tilt is corrected --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:15, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
  • I'm really not sure about this, as the horizon is perfectly horizontal. It appears to me that the slight natural drop of the land on the right side might generate a visual impression which might be perceived as tilt. --Elekhh (talk) 00:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral large and crisp but what is cape? front or back? If front is cut if back is too far. Tanakashi (talk) Puppet. Yann (talk) 11:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

You shouldn't take the filename as an exclusive description of the image. What matters is the image content: a depiction of a section of the eastern coast of Tasmania, within Tasman National Park. The geocode and the description provide you a clear explanation of the illustrated landscape (between Cape Hauy and Cape Pillar). The image shows not only the typical relief (including the bay between the two capes) but also the typical vegetation. It does not lack encyclopaedic value IMO. Please reconsider your comment. --Elekhh (talk) 06:04, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Kooritza (talk) 05:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support I love your landscapes, and everything else you do! –hoverFly | chat? 17:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support LeavXC (talk) 00:52, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:56, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not fancy the low visibilty of the background features, and I do not fancy the outdated/backdoor non-commercial GFDL 1.2 only license, which makes it a no-go for reuse on some Wikimedia project, like the German Wikipedia. --Slaunger (talk) 15:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Competent but not striking. I don't think it shows off the coast that well; my eye is drawn most to the rocks and dead branches in the foreground. Might be better if the cliff on the right was brighter. --Avenue (talk) 05:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Slaunger. --99of9 (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Nothing special about this landscape. FieldMarine (talk) 03:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support The clarity is excellent. TFCforever (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:21, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural