Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caligo eurilochus (Pieter Cramer, 1775).jpg

File:Caligo eurilochus (Pieter Cramer, 1775).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2012 at 23:31:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Caligo eurilochus (Pieter Cramer, 1775).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caligo eurilochus (Pieter Cramer, 1775).jpg

•  Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment -- Not a healthy specimen to get featured; I afraid. Jkadavoor (talk) 02:04, 6 June 2012 (UTC)and on http://sfinx.me
•  Support I think in this case the subtle pattern of damage to the wings actually gives a beautiful effect. My only concern is with the colours - the somewhat harsh flashlight might have changed the natural colours of the butterfly. Gidip (talk) 06:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support the look of an unhealty/wing-damaged butterfly is also educationally significant. But, it should be stated on the filepage, if so. Tomer T (talk) 11:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Joydeep (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Njaelkies Lea (talk) 15:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support WOW -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:28, 6 June 2012 (UTC)on http://conexion.ro
•  Support I partly agree with Jkadavoor. A healthy specimen should be shown. But I also agree with Tomer: this pic has educational value, showing how the wings of a BF get as they age... the name should be changed. I also recommend to review the colors. Think it might be a little oversaturated, and very yellow. This BF is, imo, more brown looking. --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Agree with Tomer and Paolo in the sense that this is a good candidate for VI to describe the topic, Butterfly Defense. But I prefer a picture like [1] or [2] as a FPC. (Further, very harsh flashlights.) Jkadavoor (talk) 06:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

• Sorry; I can't see any issue with the lights now. May be the problem was with my monitor. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support--H. Krisp (talk) 20:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support: The light is not perfect, but the quality is good enough to compensate for that. --Julian H. (talk/files) 10:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods