Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Caldera de las Cañadas 04.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Caldera de las Cañadas 04.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2018 at 15:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 15:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice and all, but I'm not sure I want to vote for it since it's quite similar to this picture; it's the same location and subject, just from a different position and with an additional rock. I'll think about it some more and get back to you.--Peulle (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Significantly different view, IMO, especially because of the effect of having that irregular standing rock in our faces. However, I don't know if we should support a third view including this rock if it's nominated. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Info I have no further panoramas of this side, this will be the last nomination from there (therefore there will be no "third view"). I nominated this panorama, for we have a lot of pictures of the "Roque Cinchado" (the rock in the background) on Commons, but as far as I can see none of the nearby and also intersting "Torrotito". --Llez (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Peulle's comment makes sense but this view is better than the previous one, I think. Maybe cutting the fence pillar on the left could even improve. Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Done Fence partly cropped, partly cloned out --Llez (talk) 13:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 10:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment the sky is replaced by a gradient? We see horizontal lines. This editing is valid?--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
S. DÉNIEL Please sign your comment.--Cart (talk) 12:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Cart (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- +1 for that question. Even though normal clear blue skies can produce banding, especially when making panoramas where the info is sometimes compressed in the process, this one looks very uniform with the same color values across the horizontal plane. --Cart (talk) 12:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, it is also my experience. In this case I tried to improve with several methods, and it is interesting, that in all cases the banding was not visible in photoshop, but if you open it with another program (like "Windows Fotoanzeige") or if you upload it to commons, a slight banding is visible. I think it depends on the processing by the viewing-programs. --Llez (talk) 14:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, the program is not the problem. Excessive Digital manipulations : sky totally replaced by a gradient. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 07:18, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, it is also my experience. In this case I tried to improve with several methods, and it is interesting, that in all cases the banding was not visible in photoshop, but if you open it with another program (like "Windows Fotoanzeige") or if you upload it to commons, a slight banding is visible. I think it depends on the processing by the viewing-programs. --Llez (talk) 14:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Sorry, no chance to optimize the sky, not even by starting again with the RAW file. --Llez (talk) 08:32, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)