Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH senecio incanus ssp. carniolicus.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:CH senecio incanus ssp. carniolicus.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2010 at 17:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Senecio Incanus ssp. Carniolicus. All by Dschwen (talk)
- Support -- Dschwen (talk) 17:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Unappealing composition. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:18, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, surely you can advise me then how to make the composition of this high alpine plant, which is shown in its entirety, well separated from the background, more appealing. --Dschwen (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- I think the flowers appear too far appart (distance between them larger than to edge of image), from a different angle would appear closer and more cohesive. But a very good image with high EV. --Elekhh (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, surely you can advise me then how to make the composition of this high alpine plant, which is shown in its entirety, well separated from the background, more appealing. --Dschwen (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Composition is just fine. It's not the most beautiful or exciting capture, but damned if it isn't educational. Steven Walling 19:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately, the out of focus blossom on the left (foreground) spoils it for me. Could also do with a tighter crop in my opinion. bamse (talk) 21:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support This plant is quite rare.. It looks like this has the monstrosity variation in the flower.. If I see this correctly and I think I do, this is a rare find. GerardM (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oh Gerard, even in your support you still manage to call my flower a monstrosity ;-). Hehe, just kidding. Interesting find though. Too bad the nomination period is almost over. I doubt many people will be looking this far down the page. Can you point me to some literature on this? --Dschwen (talk) 15:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)