Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Busha cemetery 2021 G06.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Busha cemetery 2021 G06.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2022 at 14:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose Certainly nice but I can’t see anything special here. In other words: no wow. --Kreuzschnabel 14:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)- Oppose per Kreuz. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support This simple, crooked, almost grass-covered gravestone touches me very much; it tells, without making many words, of the many lost lives, of all the lost love. Sometimes the simple things are the most impressive ones. Small change to the gallery link, IMHO this one fit’s better into the “Monuments and memorials” section. --Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- I positively think that each of your points is correct – just in the whole they miss the point. You’re supporting the object depicted, while on FPC we judge about the image taken of it. Your argument could, taken as it is, be applied to any image of any memorial in the world. This very cross here could have been taken in a much more breathtaking way I suppose – with a shorter focal length at shorter distance from a lower point in more appealing light, it could make an extraordinary image. This image is not extraordinary IMHO, while the cross as such still might be. --Kreuzschnabel 17:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- OK, because Kreuz has proclaimed the downfall of the West if this photo won I remove my vote, “to save the FP badge’s value”, as Mr. Kreuz has put it. --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- I positively think that each of your points is correct – just in the whole they miss the point. You’re supporting the object depicted, while on FPC we judge about the image taken of it. Your argument could, taken as it is, be applied to any image of any memorial in the world. This very cross here could have been taken in a much more breathtaking way I suppose – with a shorter focal length at shorter distance from a lower point in more appealing light, it could make an extraordinary image. This image is not extraordinary IMHO, while the cross as such still might be. --Kreuzschnabel 17:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Too ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support The way in which the gravestone is interwoven with the environment is the deciding factor for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Neutral I would oppose were it not for Aristeas' eloquent arguments, it does seem a little low on the 'wow' for me and I'm not sure the image quality is outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)- Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452641 15:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, George, but no wow, and not special for the viewer. Hard light. Highly detailed cross and highly detailed background. We have an abundance of similar images, and I don't see this one being any more poignant or artistic than any other. -- Colin (talk) 16:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Midday summer light, not special enough for FP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:33, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose no wow. Tomer T (talk) 08:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
