Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bullfight in leon 3.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2010 at 23:55:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Oppose I know it was meant to give a feeling of action, but it didn't turn out so well. The faces of both the bull and the fighter should be sharp, or at least recognizable, and the background is blurry as well. I think the speed should be quite a bit slower. Maybe blur it just enough so that you can see they're moving, perhaps 1/60 of a second. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 03:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Comment Well, I completely disagree with your opinion. Get your shutter speed argument straight. A slower shutter speed would have resulted in even more blurr. As far as your comment that the faces should be sharp is a matter of opinion, not fact ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:18, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oops, I meant a faster speed. Maybe blurring the faces can give it some artistic interest, but not EV, and the background should sharp. However, guessing by the fact that you used f/2.8, I can see that the light was bad. Are these bullfights held late in the evening? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Again, disagree about EV and that the background should be sharp. If you state it as your opinion, I am ok with it, but not not as a statement of truth. And yes, it was a late afternoon bullfight, running into early evening. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, extreme motion blur. --Murdockcrc (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support There are some images that are better off blurred, and this is one of them. An eye of a bull is more or less sharp, and everything else is about motion.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the idea, but not the fact that the background is blurred as well as the subjects. -- TFCforever (talk) 02:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree about the extreme motion blur. -- VS (talk) 17:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Motion blur. Artistic, but little interest to me--Miguel Bugallo 00:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
