Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bryce Amphitheater from Sunset Point 2019.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I withdraw my nomination Taewangkorea (talk) 08:26, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2019 at 01:50:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States
Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Taewangkorea (talk) 01:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Taewangkorea (talk) 01:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
* The account doesn't have 10 edits and according to COM:FPC such accounts cannot vote. Probably a sock puppet. Also see this, perhaps connected. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2019 (UTC) Plus this --Podzemnik (talk) 07:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Strong support -- Really like the view Adfasdfsdaddsd (talk) 01:55, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment - Invalid vote - only 2 edits so far. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose - Very good iPhone picture, but I was able to guess that it was an iPhone picture before I looked at the metadata. It looks good at 300% of my 13-inch laptop screen, but at higher magnifications - which seem legitimate for this kind of panorama - compare it to King of Hearts' photo, nominated directly above this. Welcome, Adfasdfsdaddsd, but you need 50 edits before you can vote here, and the mere fact that a photo is a panorama is not really a good reason to support its evaluation as one of the very best photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - And nice try, attempting to impersonate me, Taewangkorea. Just compare. I think this merits a warning from an admin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Not bad for iPhone picture but viewing the file at only 50 % of its size, I can still see JPG artifacts in the sky and the landscape is lacking details (perhaps too much luminance has been applied). The sky pixelation is visible at 33 % only. Pretty good picture for a phone and I think we'll see more and more phone pictures at FPC in the future. But for now, to me the quality is not there yet and I'm not wowed enough to forgive what technical side is lacking. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support Good quality for a picture taken using an iPhone 7. --Boothsift 05:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose now per below--Boothsift 01:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of details --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Like what? Taewangkorea (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Details like structure of the rocks and trees. Please compare with the photo above: File:Inspiration Point Bryce Canyon November 2018 panorama.jpg. --Cart (talk) 09:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Podzemnik. --Cart (talk) 09:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Neutral The quality is actually very good, especially since we can consider the scenery itself part of the quality of a photo. But I must admit, that it could be sharper on some of the details when viewed in full resolution. I do not want to punish people who only have rubbish Apple products more than they are already punished, but while I cannot oppose, I cannot support either. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:14, 1 July 2019 (UTC)- Oppose Very surprised this has got support from some established users. It's high-resolution and sufficient quality to use in articles, so thanks for the contribution, but quite apart from the low detail at full-res there are other major flaws including the washed-out sky and the fact that the whole image seems to be leaning to the right. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose oer Cmao20 and others. Also I refuse to support with this much vandalism going on, one instance by the nominator himself, others by IP adresses. – Lucas 16:32, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Taewangkorea (talk) 08:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
