Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brown-cheeked-fulvetta-from-kottayam-kerala.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Brown-cheeked-fulvetta-from-kottayam-kerala.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2017 at 10:32:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created by deepugn - uploaded by deepugn - nominated by User:deepugn -- Deepugn (talk) 10:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Oppose This is not a FP, sorry, and to me it isn't an QI, either. The lighting is not good, the head is in shadow. Sharpness overall is acceptable but in the head below the bar, sorry. Poco2 10:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Support Picture taken early morning, actual lighting, got the feather details sharp so thought of nominating, is there a requirement that any particular parts should be sharp for birds for being nominated to be FP, i meant like head as mentioned in previous comment? Deepugn (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)- Oppose per Poco. Sometimes, people have gotten away with the tail being unsharp, but not the head, and you should sign your post. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment thank you, wanted to get the feedback, i hope you agreed with the lighting comment also. Deepugn (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- If you want feedback, you should ask for that at Commons:Photography critiques or submit your photos to COM:QIC first where you will get that. FPC is for the finished photos, even if some things are changed here during discussions. When you present a photo here, it should already be as good as you can possibly get it. And as Ikan said; please sign your posts. --cart-Talk 11:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, i never knew about the critiques thing, think that will be a good place for my need. Deepugn (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. lNeverCry 07:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. This had possibilities—the colors are nice, the light is appropriately soft—but the pose complicated things, and unfortunately that includes the DoF, as noted. Daniel Case (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: four opposes, only one support (nominator) and four days without participation | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 20:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
