Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Glass (32606)a.jpg

File:Brooklyn Glass (32606)a.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2018 at 08:58:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Glass (32606)a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Glass (32606)a.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
•  Info created and uploaded by Rhododendrites - nominated by W.carter -- Cart (talk) 08:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Composition, color scheme, concentration! -- Cart (talk) 08:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 09:22, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Great educational value! --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks, cart. I liked visiting this glass studio so much I'll actually be returning in a couple weeks for a neon class. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  11:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Weak support In this darkness, the settings are maybe the best possible, but still this shallow depth of field make blurred some important elements like the ovens. Also the worker is seen from behind. I still support because this place with professional tools is interesting, and the action is in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support This is one of those photos that completely don't work in terms of aesthetics ... the shapes are all chaotic, there are no lines, no form. But ... I find something gritty and industrial, something very 19th century, in this. You really get the feeling this is not only as it is done, it is as it has been done. (I do think the subdued colors help very much with this). Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Basile the view from behind the worker is a bit less involving, but I don't understand Daniel's artistic negativity. There is a line of three ovens, with an odd number being powerful. There is the eye-line from worker to glass, emphasised by the tongs. And the rails (?) on the floor form the third line of a triangle round these elements. The circles and square shapes of the ovens remind me of some IQ "what's next" puzzle. The third oven acts like a glowing eye looking at the glassmaker. The pink 1 on the wall is a little distracting; I'd have been tempted to clone that out. -- Colin (talk) 07:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

For me no one line is strong enough to stand out on first glance. I didn't realize I had to like an image for the same reasons you do. Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Daniel, you don't, and I didn't say you did. If you assert an image has no lines, no form and the shapes are chaotic, then you should be cool if someone might disagree with you on that. -- Colin (talk) 20:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --The NMI User (talk) 03:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 17:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Moahim (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Pretty nice picture. --Boothsift (talk) 05:51, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tozina (talk) 20:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work