Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG

File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2012 at 21:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter 13.JPG

2230

1907

157

139

4183

2777

disturbing blurry area now corrected.

•  Info Boloria aquilonaris, Hochmoor Perlmuttfalter all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment -- This is a marvelous picture Böhringer, congratulations! I will support it one way or the other but maybe it could be improved by: (i) removing the blown parts of the leaves, e.g. by cloning; (2) cropping a bit on the sides. What I like more is the pattern of the scales on the wings, which is very detailed and sharp. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's the Nth "butterfly mating" FP candidate, and the lighting is a tad harsh. Also we don't really see the mating process (making it suitable for wide audience for sure). But very nice setting and superb composition to me. - Benh (talk) 13:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Question Are they actually mating? - Benh (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

ja, ich habe noch andere Bilder davon. --Böhringer (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:22, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- Highly competitive with the other image available. More resolution and wings more detailed here; but the heads of both butterflies are more visible in the other. The shadows (?) seem bluish to me. I didn't understand that part and the leaf bent; is it bent by you to take the photo? (I know butterflies are very friendly during mating; and I have a shot with them on my finger. ) -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:53, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support The picture has the disadvantages of being shot at noon, with harsh light on the leaf and harsh shadows on the butterflies' heads. We cannot tell these creatures when to mate... but perhaps a fill flash would have reduced the shadows on the heads. Gidip (talk) 10:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice shot, IMO too much space left on the right, there is a strange spot just below the right guy (image editing error? I added a note) and the left guy is not really sharp, Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Looks better now, thanks for the initiative Alchemist Poco a poco (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

•  Support and  Done: some dust spots removed and the editing error corrected. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

vielen Dank :-)) --Böhringer (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Tomer T (talk) 06:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
•  Support now after the edit. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods