Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bessenwants.jpg

File:Roodpootschildwants.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2013 at 13:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Roodpootschildwants.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roodpootschildwants.jpg

•  Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by Uberprutser -- Uberprutser (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but there is too much out of focus. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose same opinion --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
• So basically only focus stacked macro shots would stand a chance of getting featured? --Uberprutser (talk) 12:49, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

  That's like saying only DSLR sports pictures have a chance at FP because only DSLRs have the speed and high ISO capability to shoot sports. So the answer to your concern is, no, macro shots without stacking can be featured (particularly if the aperture is tiny or the subject is fairly equidistant from the lens), but it's much harder to do so. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Not for living stacking focus is almost impossible. Test diphragrmer more: f5, 6 is too small. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)