Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bern Parliament Plaza Flagged Wide 2019-09-13 23-11.jpg

File:Bern Parliament Plaza Flagged Wide 2019-09-13 23-11.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2019 at 05:35:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bern Parliament Plaza Flagged Wide 2019-09-13 23-11.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bern Parliament Plaza Flagged Wide 2019-09-13 23-11.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
•  Info created by and uploaded by Axel Tschentscher - nominated by Boothsift -- Boothsift 05:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Virtual-Pano (talk) 14:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Boothsift 05:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

* regretful oppose crisp and beautiful with an amazing sky! It's just that the image definitely needs perspective correction --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support ok now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:52, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Martin. --Cart (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support now after correction is done. --Cart (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Very beautiful picture, both the building and the night sky, even without correction of the perspective -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Question As I currently do not have access to any photo editing software, may I ask someone help with the perspective correction? @Axel Tschentscher: especially since you are the author and I trust that you would know how to fix it. --Boothsift 04:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Martin. Not every perspective has to be corrected, but this has to. -- -donald- (talk) 06:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral pending perspective correction. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Waiting for perspective correction too... --Moahim (talk) 07:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Question Can someone please correct the perspective? I can't because I don't have any photo editing application right now(and I probably won't get one soon)? --Boothsift 07:47, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

   Comment IMHO the results would be better if the perspective correction was done right in the RAW converter, so either Axel would have to do it himself or provide the RAW file … --Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral until (successful) perspective correction. --Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I could have done it and actually wanted to do the perspective fix. But I can see author himself already did an aspect ratio alteration, which makes me wonder which are the correct proportions. So yes, it's really the author who should do the change. - Benh (talk) 16:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support It's OK without perspective correction to me, but would obviously be better with it done. Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

   Done Did further perspective correction. Delay due to travel. Thanks for the comments. Axel ^(talk) 00:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• You should ping @Martin Falbisoner, W.carter, -donald-, Daniel Case, Moahim, and Aristeas: I believe. - Benh (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

 Question @Benh: Is there a non-obtrusive way to do so? --Axel ^(talk) 20:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

 Support--Moahim (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice that the voting period is over. Agree with Benh. --Moahim (talk) 06:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment Sorry, I did not get the ping in time. I would have change my vote to support, but now the voting period is over. Nevertheless, thank you for the additional effort with perspective correction, now the image is even greater. I am glad that it is featured! --Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I'd have gone further to get all the verticals right, but that was already FP material to me. Gorgeous exposure. - Benh (talk) 19:08, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Question Can we extend this nomination so that those notified can reply? --Boothsift 04:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

• Not necessary since it will get promoted with good margin anyway. --Cart (talk) 07:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 16:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland