Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bengali Bride.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2014 at 17:19:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by Nawshadtiash, nominated by Yann (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Yann (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp, strange processing. It looked nice and I wanted to support, but I can't. --Kadellar (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Nice image. IMO overexposed parts, too unsharp (clothes) for FP, partially posterized (flowers) oder soft (face), a little bit noisy.--XRay talk 17:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
OpposeThis is a fabulous subject, and I badly wanted to support this even with all of the defects listed above, but I can't get past the too shallow depth of field. IMO, this should be a valued image. -- Ram-Man 18:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)- Support Forget that. This is a great photo. I don't care what they say. :) -- Ram-Man 18:18, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Wish I had taken this picture! Shallow depth, that's true of course. Her hands are sharp in focus, clothes are unsharp. Her face is in 'soft focus', which I rather like. After counting the pixels and checking the noise, what remains is an impressive image! Jules Grandgagnage (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose It hurt. This could be top image, maybe too big aperture for FF on this distance. --Mile (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Appealing in thumbnail, but very disappointing at full size. A pity.--Jebulon (talk) 09:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Like it --Aftab (talk) 13:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose It's really a shame, because it looks great at smaller sizes. But something went really wrong somewhere, resulting in very strange artifacts at full size (especially where the blue of her fingers meets the red of the fingernails). Or is that because of the embedded color profile? --El Grafo (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Really crappy post-processing (and this from a perfect camera/lens combo), but a striking image that is sure acceptable viewed at 6MP. Imo that makes up for it, even though the original file would surely allow for way better quality. --DXR (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm so depply sorry, but I must agree with Xray. Is a great image, and SO pretty in the small frame, but after you see in full resolution it just cant be FP. Béria L. Rodríguez msg 14:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. Nice shot but heavily oversharpened. Not even QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 18:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 12:46, 21 November 2014 (UTC)