Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belgian F-16 Radom cleaned denoised brightened.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2009 at 13:34:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Łukasz Golowanow (User:Airwolf) and Maciek Hypś - uploaded and nominated by Wolf (talk) 13:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)- Info If you have the impression that this picture has already been nominated, you're right. That nomination, however, was stopped on the 5th day as the corresponding rule imposes, however, this was due to the fact that comments were made about how the image should be improved. Obviously, in such a situation no civil user would cast a vote, since the image thay were currently seeing was just temporary and awaiting improvement. Thus, I am renominating the image, and so as to make up for any formal reservations that could be made, I am nominating two alternatives of the same picture. Which is better, I don't know. You tell me.
- Info Previous nomination
Comment What I like about it most is the diagonal composition (a rarity in aircraft photography) and the shadows which prevent a feeling of flatness.
Support -- Wolf (talk) 13:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Neutral A good and illustrative picture and no doubt better than the very first nomination. However the shadows are harsh and the image looks like the jet had already left the image (nose closer to the picture border than the tail). There are plenty of holes underneath the wings where naturally weapons and tanks would be. Sadly we can't see them. --Ikiwaner (talk) 20:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to see an airshow with planes flying around fully armed Wolf (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment No, especially with their propensity to fly over packed crowds for long periods of time. Airshow crashes are already dangerous enough without adding in live bullets, explosives and extra fuel. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 21:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment In every civilized country such a thing - I mean flying over people - is generally forbidden, and there's always a distance, like a safety zone, between the crowd and the flying area. Wolf (talk) 21:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
- Support Wolf (talk) 13:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support Should I have said "Weak support, but support" :) BTW jokes aside, it will be better if you are to change your vote on my nomination to just "oppose" in order not confuse the bot.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- The bot will know what to do. It only cares about the {{oppose| part, all after the | is of no importance to him (her? it?) Wolf (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comment The bot does not count votes for images where alternates are available. For all images there is a manual review process to confirm the vote counting. Everyone can review a closed nomination. Don't change the order of the parameters and don't delete empty parameters since the bot is confused otherwise. --Ikiwaner (talk) 20:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- The bot will know what to do. It only cares about the {{oppose| part, all after the | is of no importance to him (her? it?) Wolf (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Much improved,love the composition - Peripitus (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support - ~ R.T.G 23:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Well done! --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support This version is way better -- Nikopol (talk) 00:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Support Basik07 (talk) 07:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles
The chosen alternative is: File:Belgian F-16 Radom.JPG
