Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg

File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 16:25:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands Restoring bog.
•  Info Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with growing peat bog. Successful recovery of bog in Bargerveen, province of Drenthe on the German border. A project in collaboration with Germany.
  All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Useful photo, but no great composition to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe not the most obvious wow-factor but I like the composition, it's the kind of photo that grows on you after a while Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not special enough in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kekek --Fischer.H (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Alternative, another version

• Weak  Oppose Both these photos have a very interesting midground and background, but their common flaw is the foreground, which at best fails to draw the viewer in and at worst distracts from the image. Such a shame, because the patterns in the water are really nice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support The composition in this version works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment This alternative seems invalid to me. The guidelines say "Alternatives are for different crops or post-processing of the original image, if they are suggested by voters". There is much more water in this version, and it's too different IMO. But in any case  Oppose as not special enough in my view, like the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)