Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baram1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Baram1.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2020 at 10:06:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Israel/Palestine
- Info created by Erez Ashkenazi - uploaded by Erez Ashkenazi - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Andrei (talk) 10:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I think it needs perspective correction and removal of the CAs, also a bit oversharpened IMO --Llez (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- FP to me if the issues pointed out by Llez are addressed --Poco a poco (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice play with long exposure, but otherwise no wow for me. Plus strong vignetting. --A.Savin 12:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Very dramatic picture but the vignetting and perspective needs to be corrected. I also think it would be better if the monument were more central in the frame, it's a bit off to the left atm. Cmao20 (talk) 13:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective etc. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I think this photo works well as a kind of slightly magical alternate reality, but I'd still like to know how long the exposure is, and the EXIF info is only about post-production. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Strong vignetting and unappealing perspective -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose perspective needs to be fixed but I'm still not sure it makes it for me with that as I don't find the juxtaposition of a long-exposure starfield and a building to be that striking in and of itself. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)