Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahama banks.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 21:50:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite_images#North_America
Info created by Sentinel-2 - uploaded by ⍨PLib - nominated by ⍨PLib -- ⍨PLib (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)- Info Not sure what people think of the border created by combining the two separate images. We could just crop it out, but I think I personally think it's better this way. -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Support -- ⍨PLib (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Strong oppose Huge stitching issue. Very visible transition. Also too contrasted. The link to the source on the file page is wrong (please give the address of the original image) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin Would you support a crop to get rid of the stitching? Also the source is correct. ⍨PLib🗣️ 01:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- No (and for other reasons), and the source links to a map, not to an image. Where does this image come from? Where can we find it on the web? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- You can't find it on the web. The source I added is where I download the raw satellite data then use QGIS to make it look normal. I didn't edit the colors, that's just how it looks. ⍨PLib🗣️ 11:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here's a similar version by NASA ⍨PLib🗣️ 11:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Top and bottom are of different colors / intensity. Technically wrong, and the original remains a mystery. How can we check? -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Heres the raw data download link if you want.
- https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/odata/v1/Products('7f0f9cae-c2f1-4322-a222-9c94906ec076')/$value ⍨PLib🗣️ 14:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Login + password required to connect -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- I know. You can create an account on the main website. ⍨PLib🗣️ 15:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Login + password required to connect -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Top and bottom are of different colors / intensity. Technically wrong, and the original remains a mystery. How can we check? -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here's a similar version by NASA ⍨PLib🗣️ 11:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- You can't find it on the web. The source I added is where I download the raw satellite data then use QGIS to make it look normal. I didn't edit the colors, that's just how it looks. ⍨PLib🗣️ 11:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- The reason I wouldn't support the cropped version is because this content does not impress me as a picture with an extraordinary visual impact. Sorry but I don't find this particular formation awesome. Not all Google satellite captures are spectacular either, to offer a comparison. The strong contrasts are unaesthetic, and the diversity of the colors quite limited. No wow, but it is just my subjectively view, of course. If freely licensed, this image may be educational in some way, but in any case I would suggest to avoid the technically deficient collage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- No (and for other reasons), and the source links to a map, not to an image. Where does this image come from? Where can we find it on the web? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think what this needs is a better explanation. I'm intrigued by the image, but I feel like I have to do a bunch of research to make sense of what I'm seeing. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here's the image zoomed out. ⍨PLib🗣️ 14:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- So it's just a satellite picture of an underwater formation? If so, I don't understand Basile's objection beyond the obvious seam. That obvious separation of tiles is going to prevent this from being featurable, but it's probably fixable. It's not misaligned or warped -- it's just a different tone, which shouldn't be that hard to fix in Photoshop. It's an interesting image with a lot of educational value -- I don't see why it wouldn't be featurable with that fixed. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here's a version from a different date without a crease
- Bahama banks sentinel2.jpg ⍨PLib🗣️ 14:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- So it's just a satellite picture of an underwater formation? If so, I don't understand Basile's objection beyond the obvious seam. That obvious separation of tiles is going to prevent this from being featurable, but it's probably fixable. It's not misaligned or warped -- it's just a different tone, which shouldn't be that hard to fix in Photoshop. It's an interesting image with a lot of educational value -- I don't see why it wouldn't be featurable with that fixed. — Rhododendrites talk | 01:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Here's the image zoomed out. ⍨PLib🗣️ 14:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Oppose Big stitching problem.--Peulle (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Withdrawing and nominating a version with no stitching issue. ⍨PLib🗣️ 12:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
