Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bad Säckingen - Fridolinsmünster2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bad Säckingen - Fridolinsmünster2.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2012 at 18:41:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately, I don't think this choice of composition works; it looks unbalanced. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:07, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
- The two towers and the top of the roof are corresponding each other. For me it's balanced, but this is my subjective opinion. What would you suggest to make this picture more balanced? --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think having more lower parts and less sky would be better. I guess it just looks a bit oddly out of place. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- what about the general view of this position File:Bad Säckingen - Fridolinsmünster3.jpg? --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think the general view looks better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- what about the general view of this position File:Bad Säckingen - Fridolinsmünster3.jpg? --Wladyslaw (talk) 04:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- I think having more lower parts and less sky would be better. I guess it just looks a bit oddly out of place. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- The two towers and the top of the roof are corresponding each other. For me it's balanced, but this is my subjective opinion. What would you suggest to make this picture more balanced? --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
