Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Auto accident on Bloor Street West in 1918.jpg

File:Auto accident on Bloor Street West in 1918.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2020 at 17:01:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Auto accident on Bloor Street West in 1918.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Auto accident on Bloor Street West in 1918.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1910-1920
•  Info created by James Salmon - uploaded by Mindmatrix - nominated by B222 -- — bertux 17:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Especially for the snow chains, as well as the clothing. High quality for 1918 -- — bertux 17:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 22:38, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment - Not sure whether to oppose, but to me, this is a curiosity and a good VI, not an outstanding composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment - From the guidelines: Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

1. Of high historic merit: [...] very early illustrations of scenes and events [...]. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, [...]

Try and find any photograph of snow chains of the pre-1920 period, let alone good quality images of them being in use (and in vain). Traffic historians won't see this as a mere curiosity — bertux 17:24, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

That level of specialization says "Valued image" to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Can't appreciate with such a small resolution. 0,692 Mpx is far below the extreme minimum of 2 Mpx required in the guidelines, and we have much bigger pictures from the same period -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment - With snow chains? See the remarks above — bertux 16:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• With even more interesting contents than snow chains -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Basile and my comments above. Please nominate this photo in the appropriate scope at COM:VIC, where (providing the scope is good, and if not, we'll work with you) it will be promoted without any arguments as historically important and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose, as noted, subpar quality and we have better. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fischer.H (talk • contribs)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)