Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Australasian Gannet (Morus serrator) in flight, from above.jpg

File:Australasian Gannet (Morus serrator) in flight, from above.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 May 2011 at 14:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Australasian Gannet (Morus serrator) in flight, from above.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Australasian Gannet (Morus serrator) in flight, from above.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by - Avenue (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Avenue (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Indeed. Wow background.--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The no-eyeness bothers indeed. Tomer T (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose omg... too small (didn't even pass the 2 MP minimum size requirement), poor white balance, centered composition, poor details (e.g. at some feathers; does this poor bird has eyes?), soft, ... Yeah, it's a nice image, but really not featured --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Concerning the size requirement, it is 2030730 pixels, which implies it does not fall below the recommended minimum resolution. --Slaunger (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
    •  Comment you're right, sorry. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
      • No problem, I actually tend to agree with your overall conclusion, although I have not completely made up my mind.... --Slaunger (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Yes Nice. -- aghith 17:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- ☭Acodered (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten. bamse (talk) 20:07, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose as kaʁstn. W.S. 22:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose as kaʁstn. --Llorenzi (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lacking sharpness, poor white balance and finally the missing eyes that Carschten mentioned.--Snaevar (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Kiran Gopi (talk) 09:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Small, very soft, and I don't like the fact that it's taken from behind. - Benh (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Maybe the bird likes it that way ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose -- As above. I deslike the "caged" animal too. Where is its eye, by the way? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

• The eye isn't really visible from this angle, but it lies in the darker area at the base of its beak. --Avenue (talk) 01:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

• Yes, I expected it to be visible in the black part in the base of the beak, but such part doesn't appear in the photo. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

• The head is tilted so that the dark part is not at all prominent, but I can see it. The eyes do not protrude, so it's not surprising to me that they're not visible here. Compare e.g. File:Australasian Gannet greeting mate.jpg, where out of seven birds, it is difficult to see the eyes of three or four of them (although admittedly one is hiding its eye behind another bird). --Avenue (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Support -- Cool! "Small?" No, it is 2MP and, uh, looks like the thing's got enough space to breath to me. ;-) -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}})
•  Support It has wow. --Lošmi (talk) 03:38, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)