Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antarctica Nathaniel B Palmer.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Antarctica Nathaniel B Palmer.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 May 2011 at 18:53:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Eli Duke - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- russavia (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor white balance, overexposed and lacking contrast.--Snaevar (talk) 21:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support The "poor white balance" is nothing more than golden hour light. I like the colors and composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, the lighting conditions are excellent and WB is alright. However, the subject is very unsharp, especially the front of the vessel. Could there be a problem with the camera/lens? I mention this because the left part of the image is much softer than the rest of it. Fantastic composition, but the unsharpness kills it for me as a FP candidate. --Murdockcrc (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Murdock, the ship is soft. I also feel like the composition is a little too reliant on the reflection. Back of the ship gets busy with the background. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 13:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice and good composition but the technical quality is not good enough. I do not think you can get it so much better with a 8MP point-and-shoot camera.--Ankara (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Murdock--shizhao (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)