Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Almeida Júnior - The Inopportune - Google Art Project.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2015 at 16:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info The Inopportune, by Almeida Júnior. Created by Google Cultural Institute - uploaded by Dcoetzee (Bot) - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Question It is a good and interesting nomination. @ArionEstar: : In the file history I see the original has an inconsistent framing, and on top of that you have uploaded two different versions to adjust the crop. Do I understand correctly that in the last crop you have aimed at just cropping out the frame without cropping anything of the painting? -- Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Slaunger: In the lower right corner had imperfections of the painting, perhaps caused by excessive wear of the time. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Please communicate with our experts who can losslessly-crop and/or carefully crop/restore such artworks. The lower-right in the original looks natural and should not have been cropped. ArionEstar, I'm getting tired of your continued low-quality mucking about with other people's images, which after repeated advice/warnings, you still seem to engage in. Either learn how to do it properly or find something else to do. -- Colin (talk) 22:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Colin: Reverted to the version of the initial crop. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Oppose --Tremonist (talk) 16:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Tremonist: Ok, but why? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Higher resolution would look nicer, don't you think so? --Tremonist (talk) 16:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Tremonist: 3 371 x 5 029 pixels are good, IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- The details appear blurred, look at the frames of the paintings for example. That's what I mean. --Tremonist (talk) 17:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
@Tremonist: Oh yes! I understand now. I also realized it, but the work is very beautiful for my oppose. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)- Yes, beautiful it is! --Tremonist (talk) 17:31, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- The details appear blurred, look at the frames of the paintings for example. That's what I mean. --Tremonist (talk) 17:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Tremonist: 3 371 x 5 029 pixels are good, IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- Higher resolution would look nicer, don't you think so? --Tremonist (talk) 16:40, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Per Tremonist. Quality is not good. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)