Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aeolian Islands at sunset.jpg

File:Aeolian Islands at sunset.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2016 at 18:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Aeolian Islands at sunset.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aeolian Islands at sunset.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info For the Jebulon's happiness (i joke ) All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
  • •  Question--Jebulon (talk) 21:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

• Jebulon...you suggest me to change sobject...I do--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

• O sorry, I thought it was a detail of a church ceiling (I joke ).--Jebulon (talk) 11:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:16, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Isasza (talk) 18:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 19:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment more sky than island Ezarateesteban 20:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes esteban, I know....is the beautiful,blue sky,red sky and island. Thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Interesting and beautiful -- Spurzem (talk) 20:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too many posterized and unsharp areas. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Daniel is not posterized is the rarefied air ..... anyway where would unsharp? thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose mostly per Daniel. It is rather noisy, there are practically no details at all on the sea, the sunset in itself is not extraordinary enough for an FP, the color especially around the islands is so posterized and saturated that at full size it almost looks like those psychedelic posters I had in my room during the 1960s, ok fond memories but not FP, sorry. --w.carter-Talk 21:48, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Daniel & WC. INeverCry 22:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Sorry, it's a nice sunset, but except for the colorful striations in the middle, the picture pretty much just sits there, and at full size, it gets worse to my eyes, as explained by others above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Lovely but the picture suffers from barrel distortion. I also wonder why it's that noisy at only ISO 100. --Code (talk) 05:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Code: Seems that the picture was taken underexposed and heavily processed: [1]. (Look at shadow, midtone and highlight params. Also contrast and exposure compensation. Not too sure which of the LR or PS triggers they refer to though). - Benh (talk) 07:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

• Well, that makes sense. Didn't see that it has AdobeRGB embedded as well. --Code (talk) 07:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well, as it seems that the author isn't interested in any improvement of this picuture, I think I'll have to oppose. A pity. --Code (talk) 11:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• I don't see distortion...and more a opposition more....what change? --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• In few words...yes,i don't care --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

• Of course that was more or less what I expected. Why are you participating here if you don't care about the feedback others give you at all? I really don't get it. This project is not just about collecting awards. --Code (talk) 07:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

• Because someone has talked about awards? Do not go out nonsense, I do not care about your opinion. It's different. This way you do it is pedantic and boring.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:24, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I was triying fix the noise, if it is not ok for you, please revert me LivioAndronico --The Photographer (talk) 03:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC) reverted --The Photographer (talk) 20:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Well, as it seems that the author isn't interested in any improvement of this picuture after of my comment I do not I received any feedback and btw, I agree with Code when he tell this project is not just about collecting awards and I found a lack of respect and maturity when LivioAndronico comment to Code I do not care about your opinion. It's different. Code deserves an apology --The Photographer (talk) 17:58, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

• And here's The Photographer who talk without being questioned. If you want respect then begins to respect others' opinions! Do what no one has asked you is not a test of maturity but of intelligence! However, I close here because probably become a boring speech which you are used to but I do not.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

• @Code: I would think Livio is participating here because he feels his photos deserve FP status. He's been right about this 96 times, so he's doing pretty well. If he doesn't want to change his images according to suggestions, so what? That's his business. Your comment about collecting awards is offensive. 96 FPs means 96 images of Livio's that were judged to be impressive enough for FP status. He earned those 96 FPs through his skill and talent as a photographer, he wasn't awarded anything. INeverCry 21:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Dear INeverCry, a good photographer not make you automatically an polite person. This place is not an street photo exhibition where opinions do not matter, it's a community based on participating which is the base too of FP section. Definitely, reviews are essential and for IMHO is the only way to improve the quality professional of this section. Code's comment refers to the fact that Livio ignored my comment followed by an immaturity act. --The Photographer (talk) 22:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: Come on, seriously? My comment was offensive? Don't you think it's offensive to ignore other users comments or attempts to help and to tell them that one doesn't care of their opinion? If he doesn't care for other users' opinions why is he presenting his pictures here? At FPC, everything is about the opinions of the community. We're not only allowed to talk if Livio wants us to. Although Livio's behaviour is always very rude some users (including myself) try to help him improve his pictures again and again and all we get in return are statements like the ones cited above. You're defending that by pointing out that he's got 96 FP stars? Really? BTW: I don't expect him to change his pictures upon my request. But I expect him to at least answer other users' comments. It's a simple issue of politness. --Code (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks INeverCry but Not speak of them, but look and pass,they wants be the new Simon Cowell or Colin --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• Ha ha! The same Simon Cowell who passed up Jennifer Hudson for Fantasia...a great judge... INeverCry 01:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

• @INeverCry: Oh, fine. A Sysop who finds it funny when I'm being insulted by Livio. Very funny indeed. You call me offensive and laugh about Livios obvious insults? Instead of laughing about Livio's bad jokes you should advise him to be polite to others. It would be nice if someone else could have a look at this thread, maybe @Christian Ferrer: , @Natuur12: or @A.Savin: for example. I don't want to take this to AN/U immediately. --Code (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pinging me [2] --A.Savin 14:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

I cant't tell that I'm happy with blocking him, however, this type of behavior within the community are unacceptable and is very regrettable also see an admin support this behavior. I have nothing more to say on this matter, only thanks A. Savin --The Photographer (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 01:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)