Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adi Holzer Werksverzeichnis 957 Mozart Engel.jpg

File:Adi Holzer Werksverzeichnis 957 Mozart Engel.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 15:33:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Adi Holzer Werksverzeichnis 957 Mozart Engel.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adi Holzer Werksverzeichnis 957 Mozart Engel.jpg

•  Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Serigraphy Mozart Engel by Adi Holzer 2006 in the size 500 x 500 mm. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
• Question: The top of the picture appears cropped (the top of the triangle and head). Is this in the original or have we lost a few mm? Colin (talk) 06:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
• Answer: Thanks for your interest. Adi Holzer made this crop in his original serigraphy. He gave me the OK in his E-mail from Friday, September 30, 2011 11:37 AM: Lieber Herr Gäbler, danke für die exzellente Wiedergabe des Mozart Engels in Wikipedia! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Is there a set of guidelines for judging photos of artworks for FP? The copyright folk regard this as "slavish copying" that "lacks originality". The artwork appears to be well photographed, though I've no idea if the original is that vivid. I guess I'm concerned someone could knock out a dozen FPs in an afternoon given the right setup and a supply of artworks to snap. Or is that concern not important if the result is a good image? Colin (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support though I am slightly concerned for the cropped out part. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 20:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support— MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)