Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbaye Notre-Dame de Ré, Ré island, Charente-Maritime, France.jpg

File:Abbaye Notre-Dame de Ré, Ré island, Charente-Maritime, France.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2015 at 21:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Abbaye Notre-Dame de Ré, Ré island, Charente-Maritime, France.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abbaye Notre-Dame de Ré, Ré island, Charente-Maritime, France.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Abbaye Notre-Dame-de-Ré dite des Châteliers, cistercian Cultural Heritage in France-- Jebulon (talk) 21:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see any difference from last time. --Mile (talk) 21:37, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't understand, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
    • No difference, really ? This nom of another picture is not for you of course, but for those who found a lack of sharpness and a wrong WB balance.--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

• Appearance, compo is same. Its really not so interesting view. --Mile (talk) 08:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support its a good pic and very differnet to the other. --Ralf Roleček 22:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Milder oppose than last time. It's been improved. Improvements are always good. But I did not think then and do not think now that its composition makes it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Daniel Case: ...But you support the compo just above, which is amost the same...--Jebulon (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

But that building isn't a ruin. Not that you couldn't photograph a ruin at three-quarters and come up with an FP, but the juxtapositions of the remaining pieces come into play. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

😛Of course I did not expect that you could admit to be wrong --Jebulon (talk) 10:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, it's not an interesting composition or angle to me. — Julian H.^✈ 19:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good IMO, Sting is not good IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 01:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For Julian --Σπάρτακος (talk ) 20:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Like it --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Just reaching the FP bar for me, can imagine the before ruined. Support for the retouching skill :) --Laitche (talk) 20:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Question Retouching skill ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Means good processing. --Laitche (talk) 09:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
    • • Controversial ! Thanks to all for interest, supporters and opposers.--Jebulon (talk) 10:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:57, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places