Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:37 Hohe Warte.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:37 Hohe Warte.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2013 at 11:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by darkweasel94 -- darkweasel94 11:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- darkweasel94 11:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No remaining texture in bright areas and the dark areas are unnaturally bright. Overall quality is not great, partly because the brightening of the shadows highlights the noise. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)- Oppose Unnatural contrast. Or does it serve a purpose? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a new version which I hope is better, esp. concerning Julian Herzog's criticism. I don't quite understand Jan Arkesteijn's criticism: where exactly do you think the contrast is unnatural? darkweasel94 09:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Unnatural contrast --Atamari (talk) 12:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, sorry. — Stas1995 (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Low contrast, unnatural colors : no FP, sorry. - Trace (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Question Even after staring at the photo for minutes, I still cannot understand what you all mean. Can anybody of you say where exactly the contrast or the colors look unnatural to you, and how you'd expect things to look? To me, who was actually there, the colors look totally natural. darkweasel94 22:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
