Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017 E-papieros mod 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2017 E-papieros mod 1.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2017 at 13:31:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment I'm in favor of turning it to be vertical so the display can be easily read. Which would also require removing the drop shadows and creating a mask for a pure white background. I can do it, but I'll give Jacek Halicki a chance to do it himself. – Lucas 17:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Lucas: I think it's a bad idea. Vertical photo will look unnatural due to the line of the fluid level in an atomiser. Besides in Wikipedia look better horizontal photos. As for the background is I do not like pictures of the cleared background, IMO look unnatural, in practice such a background does not exist. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 21:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Neutral I'm not convinced about the orientation, would have preferred to have the top higher than the body. Furthermore the subject itself is not wowing to me Poco2 09:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose The orientation and presentation fails to inspire me at all. Wrt Lucas point, I don't favour such photoshopping as extracting an image with a mask. It nearly always looks fake and is hard to do without tell-tale edges. Better to learn how to shoot an object with a white background in the first place. -- Colin (talk) 12:26, 22 January 2017 (UTC)- Oppose because of orientation and general lack of wow. I would rather consider this as VI --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:55, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I have to agree with the others here. Vertical would've been better in my opinion; if you stood it on its end, and made it symmetrical. -- Thennicke (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Thennicke. Technically leaves little to be desired, but I think a readable display would help. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
