Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017.07.11.-06-Glienicke-Rietz-Neuendorf --Lindenberger Viadukt.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Aug 2019 at 12:57:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Hockei (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not really getting this choice of composition, or wowed by the bridge. -- Colin (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)- Oppose I'm not really feeling it either. Maybe it's the light.--Peulle (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Out of your pictures of the viaduct I much prefer the composition of this one, though I'm not sure I'd vote for it as it suffers from grey highlight clipping in the current version. Cmao20 (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per others--Boothsift 07:11, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- Boothsift, I cannot understand what your reason is for the FPX-template. The quality of the picture is good and the composition is a matter of taste. Also the subject. The negative reviews above are just that. So the FPX-template is in no way justified. Please remove it or give a real reason. We have a voting period that can be exhausted. I also appeal to the other users. --Hockei (talk) 10:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment Boothsift and others, I agree with Hockei that the FPX has become too liberally used. It is intended for photos that do not meet the criteria of the guidelines and should not be used simply because a photo has got off to a bad start. If a nom gets only 'opposes' the bot will archive it early (in five day) anyway. It should not be used to simply get rid of a nom early when the photo has ok QI quality. I'm removing the template. --Cart (talk) 12:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Weak oppose A QI yes, and I don't mind the composition (although I'd have cropped the tree on the left), but not technically there for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
