Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016-07-27 Seagull in Zandvoort aan Zee (freddy2001).jpg

File:2016-07-27 Seagull in Zandvoort aan Zee (freddy2001).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Aug 2016 at 13:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2016-07-27 Seagull in Zandvoort aan Zee (freddy2001).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016-07-27 Seagull in Zandvoort aan Zee (freddy2001).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes
•  Info created by Freddy2001 - uploaded by Freddy2001 - nominated by Freddy2001 -- Freddy2001 ^talk 13:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Freddy2001 ^talk 13:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The "Yeah, so what?" expression of this gull just cracks me up! :D Fortunately, I also think it's a good picture with cool and soft colors and very different from the usual pretty and cute birds we normally see on FPC. This one stands out. I can see it on a thousand internet memes with some text in the blue field. I'm trying really hard not to get on with some myself right away. w.carter-Talk 14:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 19:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Sorry, but for a portrait of a gull, the bird isn't that clear, and gulls are so common that you should have ample opportunities to get a picture of a gull with a similar facial expression but better resolution. I also don't love the background. My general reaction is that the entire photo is less focused than ideal, and therefore, although good, not a FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Definitely needs a better development. Otherwise good indeed --A.Savin 22:30, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per Ikan. A pity ... I do love the face. Daniel Case (talk) 00:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A.Savin, please nominate a new version from RAW. --Ralf Roleček 21:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 03:08, 13 August 2016 (UTC)